1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mamaluj [8]
3 years ago
12

Tools

Law
1 answer:
valentinak56 [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

You might be interested in
HELP PLZ ASAP!!!!
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.

Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.

5 0
3 years ago
Mose was born with fetal alcohol syndrome. He lived in unstable conditions until the age of nine. His housing was inadequate and
nignag [31]
How might these challenges make Mose more likely to break the law? With the fetal alcohol syndrome, the learning disability, and the living conditions, from a psychological standpoint he has no home, no family, is with the wrong crowd, and has no examples to show him how to be a responsible man and has no one to motivate him. A study shows the overall average for prisoners had either as learning disabled or borderline learning disabled for the three sites was 32%. approximately 60 percent of adolescents and adults with FASD reported interface with the legal system, and 35 percent reported having been incarcerated for a crime. 30 to 40 percent of foster children have been arrested since they exited foster care. Over one-fourth have spent at least one night in jail and over 15 percent had been convicted of a crime. Not to put the kid down but as you can see he didn’t have much of a chance to begin with according to the study’s but he can change, at the end of the day I don’t think he really understands what he is doing is wrong and he needs someone to guide him and if he doesn’t have that I guarantee you he will continue to go down the wrong path. He has no family, no one that loves him, isn’t going to school, around the wrong people, wasn’t raised by the right family, he’s never seen anything other then the wrong way of life

How might these challenges make Mose more likely to be victimized? In court a Jury and the judge are going to see what went wrong in his life, a lawyer is going to use that as their defense which honestly isn’t a bad thing I personally don’t think the kid needs to be in jail I think he should be put in a rehab, sent to a therapist or someone that could help him

What services might help Mose avoid involvement with the criminal justice system? No services can keep him out of the system but they will help, unless they are keeping him in a program that he is at everyday and he is staying there nothing can keep him out of the system, he is going to choose what he wants to do at the end of the day, but he could for example go to like I said before therapy, rehab, if under 18 back to foster care, it would probably be up to the court if the company presses charges. I personally think a judge would not make him spend any time in jail, Juvie, prison I think they would instead realize that he needs a support system and needs someone to guide and help him, I know that’s what I would choose to do with him if I was the judge
7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements BEST supports the belief that a
yaroslaw [1]
Defense is responsible for proving a person’s innocence

Brainliest?
8 0
3 years ago
Contributions to PACs are protected by: a. the due process clause. b. the First Amendment. c. various state laws, but not protec
Daniel [21]

Answer:

b. the First Amendment.

Explanation:

The First Amendment Protects Both Political Donations and Campaign Spending

7 0
3 years ago
To obtain a class E license, you don’t need to
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

because whoever created the rules socks

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the three names that Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18 called?
    8·1 answer
  • How do lobbyist affect voters? Minimum 3 paragraphs
    5·1 answer
  • Is our CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM is fair? why or why not​
    9·1 answer
  • Biden’s White House team and Cabinet secretaries I need a very detailed paragraph about this
    10·1 answer
  • What do you know about the bill of rights .( five sentence ).
    7·2 answers
  • What happens if a minor gets caught smoking with other minors
    15·1 answer
  • Who do you want to win the election
    8·2 answers
  • Are two cases every really identical? Let's take a look at the cases below.
    8·1 answer
  • Drag each characteristic to the correct location on the table. Each characteristic will be used only once.
    8·1 answer
  • Some attorneys contact many experts as a ploy to disqualify them or prevent opposing counsel from hiring them; this practice is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!