1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mamaluj [8]
3 years ago
12

Tools

Law
1 answer:
valentinak56 [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

You might be interested in
Jordan is especially interested in the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. He is convinced that most jurors
Arisa [49]

Answer:

This is a difficult situation. If a juror would see the defendant crying it could impose that they are sorry for what they did if they were guilty. Dressing appropriately can show you're not a bum and do have dignity. Acting appropriately can impose you are mature.

5 0
3 years ago
_____ increase your risk.
-BARSIC- [3]
A, all of forms distraction.
6 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, what is the most important law and why?
CaHeK987 [17]
Courts because they help settle things
8 0
3 years ago
What evidence could be given to show that the executive branch is more powerful today than originally intended in the constituti
Artist 52 [7]
When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.

Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
3 0
3 years ago
15. Which of the following statements concerning national files housed in the FBI Crime
pshichka [43]

Answer:

I believe that the answer is A

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the correct answer. Cameron works for his state’s highway patrol agency. His role in the agency is that of a chief execut
    12·2 answers
  • Question 29 (3 points)
    7·1 answer
  • What is the 6 -digit grid coordinate for federal state market in grid square EG0093? JROTC ARMY
    8·1 answer
  • What is article 12 in the UAE law book?
    9·2 answers
  • What is a court of limited jurisdiction? (Select all that apply.)
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the first law given to? *
    6·1 answer
  • What do u guys think of this its my rap
    14·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank.
    14·1 answer
  • 5. A LAW IS CONSIDERED UNCONSITUTIONAL IF IT EXPANDS RIGHTS GIVEN TO
    14·1 answer
  • The idea that crime is a persons choice is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!