Answer:
Who is the real monster in Frankenstein?
Victor Frankenstein is the real monster. In 1972, Gaylin lamented that "the tragic irony is not that Mary Shelley's 'fantasy' once again has a relevance. The tragedy is that it is no longer a 'fantasy'—and that in its realization we no longer identify with Dr. Frankenstein but with his monster.".
Explanation:
The true name of the monster was never revealed, instead many gave it the last name of his creator, Victor Frankenstein. Although perhaps that was society’s intent while repurposing this story, to refer to the real monster himself, Mr. Victor Frankenstein; the man who created and abandoned a creature that was capable of destruction. Shelley did not give the hideous creature a name, perhaps for a reason. To not name something dehumanizes it and makes that thing an It – lack of identify due to no name fear of unknown. Yet she gives it such human characteristics by allowing the beast to talk, read, learn another language and even have the capabilities of emotions. Connect better, Sometimes the real monster is not the hideous beast standing in front of you, but rather the beast looking back at you in the mirror. Marry Shelley related Frankenstein’s creation as the product of neglect and lack of responsibility by the creator, a situation all too relevant to today’s society, specify that Mary Shelley wrote the book.
The monster did not choose to be created, he did not choose to look the way that he did, he did not choose to be rejected by everyone around him. As he tells Victor when he approached him in the Alps, “I am malicious because I am miserable.” emphasize what the deeper reasoning is. analyze. There is no moral excuse for the monster’s killing spree, but there may have been a deeper reasoning for Shelley having the monster express this to his creator and possess such strong emotions. When the beast was created, he was brought to the world and left to interact with no one but himself. He discusses with Victor how hard it was for him to even walk around because people would scream in fear at his appearance; Even his own creator left him. clarify that i think the monster is a monster because of doctor, there are two monsters.
(if there aren't any options) it really just depends on your opinion, but to me it would have to be 1st person. it can also can be considered the most explanatory, but again that's only my opinion.
hope this is helpful!
I want to inform you that the summary on Peace like a River will not be short. Here is the paragraph I managed to find. One part Christian-inflected odyssey, one part tragedy, and one part classic adventure in the American West, Peace Like a River by Leif Enger is the story of a 1960s Minnesota family narrated by the asthmatic Reuben, the product of the first of his father’s seven miracles. The title takes its name from the Christian hymn “It Is Well With My Soul” In case, you feel like this is not enough, I want you to check what the writers from Prime Writings can do for you.
If you mean a good critic, no, they won't. The answer is false.
Answer:
D. The story should be set in a local place to minimize production costs.
Why?
When you write a speculative script, it means that instead of someone paying you to write them a script for a movie, you write a script and hope for it to get sold by a company that is interested in it.
If it's set in a local place to minimize production costs, it would be a win-win for both parties, the buyer and the seller, resulting in your script getting sold and the movie production company to still make a profit with low production costs.
