1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zavuch27 [327]
3 years ago
12

Brinkmanship is best defined as

History
2 answers:
maria [59]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is option B. "taking a dispute to the edge of conflict to force an enemy to back down". Brinkmanship is the act of trying to pursue a goal by pushing the conflict to the limit. Forcing an enemy to back down by taking the dispute to the edge is an example of applying brinkmanship to achieve a goal.

8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
3 0
Brinkmanship is suggesting war or allowing a situation to dangerously out of control in order to get your opponent to back down.

- - -
<span>B.taking a dispute to the edge of conflict to force an enemy to back down.</span> 
You might be interested in
What are some possible effects that the Indian removal act may have had on native Americans already living in the west?
Alla [95]

Answer:

The Indians may fight for their land and their would be war. What was the Trail of Tears? The Cherokee's 800-mile forced march to Indian Territory from Georgia

5 0
3 years ago
In what way were the Spartans forward thinking in
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

battle strategy was their highest point of thinking

Explanation:

building wearing clothes

6 0
3 years ago
why do you think the Sherman Antitrust Act and other attempts at regulating monopolies and trusts were not effective?
Vesna [10]
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
6 0
3 years ago
Why was Carnegie Steel able to offer its product at a lower price than its competitors?
diamong [38]

The answer to this multiple question is:

~Carnegie could cut his costs because he owned the supply of raw materials and the means of production and distribution.

~So the answer is C.


Hope this helps!!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is the sovereignty of a nation-state limited?
Natalija [7]
The ability to vote
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Napoleon laid out a new set of laws in 1804 called the ______ ,which called for religious freedom and equality before the law.
    7·2 answers
  • Which nation helped the united states invade iraq in 2003
    13·1 answer
  • Which countries have NOT signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
    9·1 answer
  • Burgoyne’s surrender, marking the war’s turning point
    12·1 answer
  • Which country received most of South America by the Line of Demarcation?
    12·1 answer
  • The declaration can best he underslood as a
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the great depression called the great depression
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true about the chief justice of the supreme court
    8·1 answer
  • Someone plz help me :
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the German support hitlers anti Jewish policies?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!