All categories

3 years ago

Personal jurisdiction is not possible over the objection of an out of state defendant ________.

Business

1 answer:

fenix001 [56]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

NOT-unless the court believes that justice would be served.

Explanation:

Personal jurisdiction in legal setting can be regarded as the power conferred on a court to make decision on the case of the party that's been sued, for the court to exercise this power , there is a requirement that the party must have contact in minimum way together with forum in the court.

You might be interested in

True/False/Explain – If all production processes were subject to constant returns to scales for all output levels, monopolistic

Elena L [17]

The answer is true okay!

4 0

3 years ago

Based on current dividend yields and expected capital gains, the expected rates of return on portfolios A and B are 12% and 16%,

monitta

Answer:

Alpha for A is 1.40%; Alpha for B is -0.2%.

Explanation:

First, we use the CAPM to calculate the required returns of the two portfolios A and B given the risks of the two portfolios( beta), the risk-free return rate ( T-bill rate) and the Market return rate (S&P 500) are given.

Required Return for A: Risk-free return rate + Beta for A x ( Market return rate - Risk-free return rate) = 5% + 0.7 x (13% - 5%) = 10.6%;

Required Return for A: Risk-free return rate + Beta for B x ( Market return rate - Risk-free return rate) = 5% + 1.4 x (13% - 5%) = 16.2%;

Second, we compute the alphas for the two portfolios:

Portfolio A: Expected return of A - Required return of A = 12% - 10.6% = 1.4%;

Portfolio B: Expected return of B - Required return of B = 16% - 16.2% = -0.2%.

8 0

2 years ago

Ashley (a single taxpayer) is the owner of ABC LLC. The LLC (which reports as a sole proprietorship) generates QBI of $900,000 a

Andrews [41]

Answer:

Detailed solution is given below in tabular form:

3 0

3 years ago

sally borrowed $1000 from her friend monique two years ago. their arrangement required sally to repay $250 each year for the sub

ANEK [815]

Answer:

Explanation:

Here are the options to this question :

A. yes, 475 is more than the PV of the two remaining payments

B. More information is needed to decide

C. Monique is indifferent between the options, the PVs are equivalent

D. No, the PV of the remaining two payments is more than 475

We have to determine the present value of the remaining two payments and compare the options

Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows

Present value can be calculated using a financial calculator

Cash flow in year 1 = 0

Cash flow in year 2 = 0

Cash flow in year 3 = 250

Cash flow in year 4 = 250

I = 2%

PV = $466.54

$475 is greater than $466.54. Therefore, she should accept the single $475 payment

To find the PV using a financial calculator:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

3. Press compute

8 0

3 years ago

Mateo exchanges a rental house at the beach with an adjusted basis of $225,000 and a fair market value of $200,000 for a rental

FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

a.$0

Explanation:

Adjusted basis is the cost of a property and other related costs incurred in acquiring, maintaining, or upgrading the property.

Fair value represent the worth of a property. It is the amount that one should expect to fetch from the market if they were to sell the property.

The fair value or the worth for Mateo's rental house is $200,000. He obtains another rental house with a fair value of $180,000 and cash $20,000.

He exchanged property worth $200,000 for $200,000

7 0

2 years ago