Billy's hands trembled as he moved the mouse, and my face dropped. He had just received his emailed document from the college he planned to attend. Beckoning with his hand for me to come closer, he pulled up the document. I took a shaky breath and read the words on the screen. He was accepted.
may I have Brainliest?
I've had a sh!.tty day ;^;
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
He was free from the isolation and corruption of the island, and since he died innocently, the boys figured that he shall float away from the insanity.
Explanation:
Answer:
Red meat was expensive, and only the rich could afford it
Explanation:
The Elizabethans ate three meals a day like anyone else, the meals varying from a chord to their riches among families. Poorer people could only buy vegetables and white meat such as fish, chicken and rabbits while the rich could eat red meat more consistently. In 1563 Elizabeth created a law that compelled everyone to eat fish meat every Wednesday, Fridays and Saturdays by encouraging the fish industry and reducing the fish price to the poor.
