1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
13

Summarize the argument being made in this document. What is the most compelling evidence used by the author to support it?

History
2 answers:
Lana71 [14]3 years ago
8 0
You may be surprised to hear that the word “argument” does not have to be written anywhere in your assignment for it to be an important part of your task. In fact, making an argument—expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence—is often the aim of academic writing. Your instructors may assume that you know this and thus may not explain the importance of arguments in class.

Most material you learn in college is or has been debated by someone, somewhere, at some time. Even when the material you read or hear is presented as a simple fact, it may actually be one person’s interpretation of a set of information. Instructors may call on you to examine that interpretation and defend it, refute it, or offer some new view of your own. In writing assignments, you will almost always need to do more than just summarize information that you have gathered or regurgitate facts that have been discussed in class. You will need to develop a point of view on or interpretation of that material and provide evidence for your position.

Consider an example. For nearly 2000 years, educated people in many Western cultures believed that bloodletting—deliberately causing a sick person to lose blood—was the most effective treatment for a variety of illnesses. The claim that bloodletting is beneficial to human health was not widely questioned until the 1800s, and some physicians continued to recommend bloodletting as late as the 1920s. Medical practices have now changed because some people began to doubt the effectiveness of bloodletting; these people argued against it and provided convincing evidence. Human knowledge grows out of such differences of opinion, and scholars like your instructors spend their lives engaged in debate over what claims may be counted as accurate in their fields. In their courses, they want you to engage in similar kinds of critical thinking and debate.

Argumentation is not just what your instructors do. We all use argumentation on a daily basis, and you probably already have some skill at crafting an argument. The more you improve your skills in this area, the better you will be at thinking critically, reasoning, making choices, and weighing evidence.
Nady [450]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

This is what I used for mine and my teacher gave me 100!

Explanation:

This evidence has been jointly analyzed by South Vietnamese and American experts. The evidence shows that the hard core of the Communist forces attacking South Vietnam were trained in the North and ordered into the South by Hanoi. It shows that the key leadership of the Vietcong , the officers and much of the cadre, many of the technicians, political organizers, and propagandists have come from the North and operate under Hanoi's direction. It shows that the training of essential military personnel and their infiltration into the South is directed by the Military High Command in Hanoi.

As in every Communist state, the party is an integral part of the regime itself. North Vietnamese officials have expressed their firm determination to absorb South Vietnam into the Communist world. Through its Central Committee, which controls the Government of the North, the Lao Dong Party directs the total political and military effort of the Vietcong. The Military High Command in the North trains the military men and sends them into South Vietnam.

The Central Research Agency, North Vietnam's central intelligence organization, directs the elaborate espionage and subversion effort. Under Hanoi's overall direction the Communists have established an extensive machine for carrying on the war within South Vietnam. Its principle function is to influence opinion abroad and to create the false impression that the aggression in South Vietnam is an indigenous rebellion against the established Government. For more than 10 years the people and the Government of South Vietnam, exercising the inherent right of self-defense, have fought back against these efforts to extend Communist power south across the 17th parallel.

The United States has responded to the appeals of the Government of the Republic of Vietnam for help in this defense of the freedom and independence of its land and its people.

You might be interested in
a. Briefly explain ONE common trait in the policies of TWO of these European nations toward Native Americans: - England - France
Sphinxa [80]
The common trait was the intention to Christianize the Indians - that is to convert them to the Christian religion. The Spaniards were more brutal in this, often Christianizing by force, but the English also made strong attempts to convert the Indians.

Another common trait was the lack of interest in the local languages with the exception of priests or monks , who did it to be able to preach about Christianity to the natives.
6 0
4 years ago
Who were the real winners of the Space Race (the Soviet or the US) Why?
umka21 [38]

Answer:

soviets

Explanation:

because they were the first to send a satellite into space thus the first to reach space

6 0
3 years ago
The earliest societies of Mesopotamia believed their rulers had divine right
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

Explanation:

(1). As these societies grew in size, more complex governments and bureaucracies emerged

The was born the culture, mathematics, astronomy,  between earliest civilizations. Was considered where was born importants fiedls our history

3 0
3 years ago
13. Egyptian leaders who were considered gods in human form. They controlled the army, and
blsea [12.9K]

the answer is b Pharaoh

Explanation:

:)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Two different historians decide they want to examine the same event: a 20-year war that took place in ancient times. One hist
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

Two different historians decide they want to examine the same event: a 20-year war that took place in ancient times. One historian is a cultural historian. The other is a military historian. Describe the particular aspects of the war that each historian would be interested in. Write three questions you think each historian would ask about the event (six total questions). Be sure to clearly develop and organize your ideas, using complete sentences to respond.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did ethnic tension become such a severe problem in the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia?
    9·1 answer
  • What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed to the sand creek massacre?
    7·1 answer
  • why were early christians at odds with the roman leaders? they believed there was only one god and did not worship the emperor.
    9·1 answer
  • Why would the vocabulary words militarism and mobilization be included in a description of wwi?
    10·1 answer
  • What was Paris called before Paris?
    5·1 answer
  • What could be some ways for the country to improve the economy? Explain
    11·2 answers
  • What did Jim Bowie do as Mexican soldiers started arriving at the Alamo
    5·1 answer
  • PLS HELP ME WILL MARK BRAINLIEST (any non-related answer will get reported!)
    14·2 answers
  • What is the author’s bias or prejudice within this document? Christmas in the trenches
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!