1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
13

Summarize the argument being made in this document. What is the most compelling evidence used by the author to support it?

History
2 answers:
Lana71 [14]3 years ago
8 0
You may be surprised to hear that the word “argument” does not have to be written anywhere in your assignment for it to be an important part of your task. In fact, making an argument—expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence—is often the aim of academic writing. Your instructors may assume that you know this and thus may not explain the importance of arguments in class.

Most material you learn in college is or has been debated by someone, somewhere, at some time. Even when the material you read or hear is presented as a simple fact, it may actually be one person’s interpretation of a set of information. Instructors may call on you to examine that interpretation and defend it, refute it, or offer some new view of your own. In writing assignments, you will almost always need to do more than just summarize information that you have gathered or regurgitate facts that have been discussed in class. You will need to develop a point of view on or interpretation of that material and provide evidence for your position.

Consider an example. For nearly 2000 years, educated people in many Western cultures believed that bloodletting—deliberately causing a sick person to lose blood—was the most effective treatment for a variety of illnesses. The claim that bloodletting is beneficial to human health was not widely questioned until the 1800s, and some physicians continued to recommend bloodletting as late as the 1920s. Medical practices have now changed because some people began to doubt the effectiveness of bloodletting; these people argued against it and provided convincing evidence. Human knowledge grows out of such differences of opinion, and scholars like your instructors spend their lives engaged in debate over what claims may be counted as accurate in their fields. In their courses, they want you to engage in similar kinds of critical thinking and debate.

Argumentation is not just what your instructors do. We all use argumentation on a daily basis, and you probably already have some skill at crafting an argument. The more you improve your skills in this area, the better you will be at thinking critically, reasoning, making choices, and weighing evidence.
Nady [450]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

This is what I used for mine and my teacher gave me 100!

Explanation:

This evidence has been jointly analyzed by South Vietnamese and American experts. The evidence shows that the hard core of the Communist forces attacking South Vietnam were trained in the North and ordered into the South by Hanoi. It shows that the key leadership of the Vietcong , the officers and much of the cadre, many of the technicians, political organizers, and propagandists have come from the North and operate under Hanoi's direction. It shows that the training of essential military personnel and their infiltration into the South is directed by the Military High Command in Hanoi.

As in every Communist state, the party is an integral part of the regime itself. North Vietnamese officials have expressed their firm determination to absorb South Vietnam into the Communist world. Through its Central Committee, which controls the Government of the North, the Lao Dong Party directs the total political and military effort of the Vietcong. The Military High Command in the North trains the military men and sends them into South Vietnam.

The Central Research Agency, North Vietnam's central intelligence organization, directs the elaborate espionage and subversion effort. Under Hanoi's overall direction the Communists have established an extensive machine for carrying on the war within South Vietnam. Its principle function is to influence opinion abroad and to create the false impression that the aggression in South Vietnam is an indigenous rebellion against the established Government. For more than 10 years the people and the Government of South Vietnam, exercising the inherent right of self-defense, have fought back against these efforts to extend Communist power south across the 17th parallel.

The United States has responded to the appeals of the Government of the Republic of Vietnam for help in this defense of the freedom and independence of its land and its people.

You might be interested in
What does President Washington see as dangers to the success of a newly formed United States of America? Cite excerpts from the
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

1. Political Infighting

2. Loyalty to party over nation

3. Foreign influence and corruption

Explanation:

1. Political Infighting: he advised both the north and southern region to remain together because they benefit each other going forward rather than fighting for supremacy or looking for differences.

2. Loyalty to party over the nation: here he advised that voting along with the love of party over nation among electorates can lead to a spirit of revenge and affect nation growth. It can also promote unprincipled men to power.

3. Foreign influence and corruption: here he encouraged foreign relations to be based on commercial activities alone, but an extreme foreign alliance with a particular nation should be avoided.

4 0
3 years ago
Why is comparative mythology important to the study of myths?
MatroZZZ [7]
Because that is how people used to explain things
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the goal of<br> Propaganda after US enters<br> the war in 1917?
tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

The main goals of the Propaganda after US enters  the war in 1917 were to increase support for the army troops and achieve victory

Explanation:

The main goals of Propaganda after US enters  the war in 1917 were -

a) Demoralization of Army of enemies

b) Encourage the morale of troops of their own  army

c) Gather support from civilians

d) Increase support of the war

e) Achieve victory

6 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the Molotov rippentrop pact
dmitriy555 [2]
The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact , or the Nazi-Soviet pact was the guide that delineated the spheres of interest between both powers. It was <span>confirmed by the "supplementary protocol" of the </span>German–Soviet Frontier Treaty <span>amended after the joint </span><span>invasion of Poland.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
How did enslaved Africans contribute to life in the colonies
kolezko [41]
They did most of the labor for plantations and other lines of work, for free. This saved a lot of money on labor for the colonies.
Please vote my answer brainliest so I can level up.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How do you plan to continue exploring careers on your own?
    12·2 answers
  • What was the Reconquista?
    8·2 answers
  • Name five types of gladiators and what were there functions
    9·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor? Check all that apply.
    6·2 answers
  • What were the views of truman and mac arthur on how to best win the war in korea?
    8·1 answer
  • France”s colonization of Vietnam was considered
    13·1 answer
  • Who defeated napoleon? <br> a. wellington <br> b. robespierre <br> c. washington <br> d. louis xvi
    6·1 answer
  • What effect did Soviet achievements in space have on American society and culture?
    5·1 answer
  • Who wrote The Wealth of Nations, a book encouraging free markets, division of labor, and increased productivity?
    11·2 answers
  • Bob Thomas wishes to run for US president. Which characteristic disqualifies him under the rules of the US Constitution?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!