Answer:
Explanation:
Polk's Whig opposition at this USA presidential election, 1844 was Henry Clay of KY. Incumbent Whig chairman John Tyler; the former Democrat; had become alienated from the Whigs and was not appointed for the second period. The topic of the Texas Annexation, which was at the vanguard during the Republican meeting, once more dominated the race. Polk was a powerful advocate of direct annexation, while Clay represented a more equivocal and vacillating point. Another race subject, also referring to westward expansion, involved the Oregon region, so under the common occupation of the United States and united kingdom. The Democrats had championed the case of expansion, informally relating the disputed Texas annexation issue with the claim to the whole Oregon region, so appealing to both North and South expansionists. Polk's help for West expansion was logical, what Democrat lawyer John L. O'Sullivan could tell `` Manifest Destiny ''; and probably played an crucial part at his success, as opponent Henry Clay hedged his position on this as well.
The 1821 constitution expanded voting rights by:
- Including white males who were up to the age of 21 and above and who have lived in the states a minimum of 1 year before the election and paid tax to the government.
- Colored males who have also lived in the state for up to three years and paid tax to the government.
<h3>What voting rights did the 1821 constitution provide?</h3>
The voting rights of 1821 expanded voting rights by giving colored people the opportunity to be at the polls. This is a landmark achievement because prior to this time, colored people were not given voting rights.
However, with the new provisions that this law was providing, colored people who now met the specifications of the law could cast their votes.
This new development is a commendable one because the United States did not previously allow Black people to vote in elections. Now, their male folks could vote if they fulfilled the standards specified for them.
Learn more about the voting rights in New York here:
brainly.com/question/26371221
#SPJ1
Answer: funny man with a funny mustache
Explanation:
he wasnt cool
Answer:
C but can also be A
Explanation:
this is bc some law made so that the supreme court decides whether a law is constitutional and b is wrong its sort of the middle step no matter where the policy comes from it has to go through congress and pass w a 2/3 majority vote. i'd go w A bc why would a state official try and change it when they already make the laws for their state
He got 271 electoral votes.