Answer: From the passage, Fred Hampton is saying what may cost him his life, he is probably saying what would expose the decay in the system, and when he does so, more people are enlightened and would want to join him, so they are planning to get rid of him(which could have various terms but might not be a pleasant experience?
Explanation:
Fred Hampton was an activist. Activist play one role in the society and that's speaking out the wrongs in government. In doing such, they might be attacked by the ruling government or those benefitting from the government. In most cases, they might be set up for death and people may not really know but would just hear that an activist was killed
From the passage, Fred Hampton is saying what may cost him his life, he is probably saying what would expose the decay in the system, and when he does so, more people are enlightened and would want to join him, so they are planning to get rid of him(which could have various terms but might not be a pleasant experience
Answer:
A: Took over men’s jobs and supported the war effort.
Explanation:
hope you like it!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Learning to domesticate plants and animals changed the way humans lived.
Explanation:
Which statement is the most likely conclusion you can draw from the cause-and-effect relationship shown in the diagram?
The second option is correct.
B. Business, as long as the government is served.
Answer:
Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a case in which New York State's Board of Regents attempted to force children to pray in public schools. The Supreme Court ruled that this law violated the First Amendment. The ruling affirmed that, in the United States, church and state (religion and government) were separate. If a child attended a public school, he/she should be able to express his/her own religious beliefs in any way he/she sees fit. The case of West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) involved forced participation in the Pledge of Allegiance. Two students claimed they could not participate in the pledge based on religious beliefs and sued the state board. Again, the Supreme Court agreed that the students should be allowed to excuse themselves from any ceremonies that offended their religious beliefs.
Explanation:
