Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
An interest rate is an amount charged by a lender on the use of assets. It is expressed as a percentage of the principal. The interest rate is the return on lending for a lender and the cost of borrowing for the borrower.
Interest is typically paid on a loan to compensate for the opportunity cost of lending money. A lender could invest the money instead of lending and get a higher return from it.
To compensate for not using the money for an alternative purpose or for temporarily making do without the money that was lent, the borrower pays a certain percentage of principal to the lender.
Services are now the largest single component of the supply side of gdp, representing over half of gdp.
Answer:
This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.
Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.
The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.
The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.
If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.
Answer:
Answer 2 : This inventory system computes and records costs of goods sold at the end of the period.
Explanation:
The time at which records of costs of goods sold is done determines a company`s inventory system.
Two inventory systems exist which companies can use in their business which are Periodic and Perpetual inventory systems.
Periodic Inventory System
In this system recording of cost of goods sold is done at the end of a certain period.It could be after a week, month or year.This is the type is system that is being explained in the question.
Perpetual
The other is the other system of recording cost of goods sold. In this system cost of goods sold is computed at end of each sale ( at the time of sale)
Hence it is important to note when the count of inventory is done. If at the end of a period then its Periodic and when count is done after every sale then that is Perpetual.
B. When the goal of analyzing is to determine the strength of the argument
