The Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional as it limited free speech, which is guaranteed in the first Amendment. If the individual states chose to nullify the acts, that would be a sign of rebellion. I do not think that the US should institute forms of the Alien and Sedition Act. It's America. The people here should be free to say what they want to say.
<span>c. one house can act as a check on the other.
</span>
Answer:
Without the answer options i can not answer your question correctly
Explanation:
Coaches and players should be allowed to pray on the field after a game, and this does not violate separation of church and state, because base on this, government is expected to be neutral as regards religion activities.
<h3>What is separation of church and state and the impact on players ?</h3>
Separation of church and state serves as the idea that is base on the ground that government should not have any bias interest as regards all religions.
This means that government should not officially recognize or favor any one religion, and on the playing field too, it should not be a case, for praying base on individual religion after the match.
It should be noted that the First Amendment, that is been put in place in 1791, explain that "Congress should not be involved in making any law that can bring about the establishment of religion, even though the "separation of church and state" is not found in the United States Constitution.
Learn more about religion on:
brainly.com/question/11541955
#SPJ1
I believe the answer you're looking for is VETO.
A Veto is a constitutional right to reject a decision.
-Seth
