Answer: monopoly
Explanation: some areas had a monopoly on certain or goods. china supplied west Asia and the Mediterranean world with silk while spices were obtained principally from south Asia.
I took the test
In this case, the psychologist is trying to establish<u> "construct validity" </u>of the measure.
Construct validity is "how much a test estimates what it claims, or implies, to quantify.
There are various distinctive estimates that can be utilized to approve tests, one of which is build legitimacy. Build legitimacy is utilized to decide how well a test estimates what it should quantify. As it were, is the test built in a way that it effectively tests what it professes to test? Construct validity is normally confirmed by contrasting the test with different tests that measure comparable characteristics to perceive how exceptionally associated the two measures are.
Answer:
the correct answers are central location and space to expand
Answer:
D. Declared that wearing a black armband to protest the Vietnam War was a form of symbolic speech. Declared that political spending was a form of protected free speech.
Explanation:
These two statements express two policy-creating decisions that can be considered to be relatively equivalent. Both of these statements deal with the subject of free speech, one of the most important concepts in our government. Moreover, both of these decisions came as a result of a Supreme Court case. In the case of the first one, this was the decision <em>Tinker v. Des Moines ( 1969)</em>. In the case of the second one, this came due to the case<em> Citizens United v. FEC (2010)</em>.
Your answer is D. Hope that helps
