1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
13

could go either way truly but majority opinion would be for letting the vote remain as optional america is all about freedom we

have choices and rights by forcing us to vote would be againest our own amendments...Other side ofthe arguement is that we should force people to vote so they cant complain when we get a bad president biggest example is the Trump vs hillary situation people didnt vote bc they didnt like either one so we got stuck with trump now people are upset that hes bad president
History
2 answers:
ycow [4]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Stop talking sh*t bout Trump He was the best president n 74M people Voted him again.

SCORPION-xisa [38]3 years ago
7 0

Forcing people to vote, especially in times when voter suppression is growing (e.g., Republicans opposing the recent bill that will 'stop voter suppression'). If someone doesn't want to vote, however, irresponsible that may be, there's nothing the government can do about it. It's only fair to say that if you didn't vote then you can't complain about the presidency, however, you also can't tell people what to think, believe, or feel as this is the "land of the free." Anything beyond allowing people to their opinions is practically mind control. I would go with the first option here, only because "American values" and "land of the free" and all that, ya know? Elections are always unpredictable, and isn't that just what makes American wonderful?

You might be interested in
What is the long-term impact of the Korean War on North and South Korea?
Bond [772]

Answer:

B. North Korea has grown isolated, while South Korea's economy has grown

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Peloponnesian War start?
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

The primary causes were that Sparta feared the growing power and influence of the Athenian Empire. The Peloponnesian war began after the Persian Wars ended in 449 BCE. ... This disagreement led to friction and eventually outright war. Additionally, Athens and its ambitions caused increasing instability in Greece

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The primary cause of death among Native Americans during the
Nata [24]

Answer:

Option A

Explanation:

During the colonial era where Europeans started settling and colonizing all over the country brought many germs with them that they were immune too. Because of that fact "New world diseases" or option A such as: chicken pox, the flu, and malaria sweeping through the country at a alarming rate killing at least 90% of Native Americans in the country.

Hope this helps.

7 0
2 years ago
How did rooms location affect its development
liraira [26]
There are different places
5 0
3 years ago
The way most cases reach the supreme court is
WITCHER [35]
There are a few ways: 

<span>1) The most common is on appeal from state courts. A case originating in state court must work its way through the state court system up to the state's court of last resort (i.e. state supreme court), and then it can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but only if there is a substantial question involving a question of U.S. constitutionality. </span>

<span>2) On appeal through the Federal court system. A common route for a case involving Federal laws and the U.S. Constitution is for it to be first tried in the U.S. District Courts, and then appealed to the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals. The party losing at the Circuit Court may then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. </span>

<span>In each of these two situations, the Supreme Court has the option to deny a hearing for the appeal. </span>

<span>3) There are a limited scope of cases that can go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court without having to go through the lower court systems. This is not common at all, but is provided for in Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following led to World War II?
    9·2 answers
  • How are nations similar to individuals in regard to economics ? A.nations do not have to pay for public goods and services
    5·1 answer
  • An astronomer's work should explain past astronomical observations as well as
    5·1 answer
  • He main purpose of the legislative branch is to
    13·2 answers
  • How were women protected by the magna carta?
    8·1 answer
  • When a Senate subcommittee released its final report in 1919 entitled "Bolshevik Propaganda" newspapers across the country sensa
    15·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP ASAP !!! I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLIEST !!!
    11·2 answers
  • What do you know about the effects and consequences of Watergate?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the name of the<br> treaty that ended World War
    10·2 answers
  • What is a key difference between the Earliest works of history, such as Homer's The Odyssey, and modern works of History?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!