Wen, a consumer researcher, is conducting a research on the buying behavior of the hispanics. as part of her study, she calculates a consumer's buying power by relating it to the consumer's income. the consumer attributes that wen employs in her research can best be described <u>demographics.</u>
Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.
We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.
We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
<em>You are listening to gather intel on a particular individual or set of individuals.</em>
Answer:
$10,200
Explanation:
The computation of the deferred income tax expense or benefit is shown below:
Favorable temporary difference = $50,000
Less: Unfavorable temporary difference -$20,000
Net favorable temporary difference $30,000
We assume the tax rate is of 34%
So, the deferred tax expense is
= $30,000 × 34%
= $10,200
By finding out the net favorable temporary difference and then multiplied with the tax rate we can get the deferred tax expense and the same is shown above
