Random girl from the web.
Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
If the SEC and the AICPA, worked altogether in order to share the information, they might have detected the fraud prior. The case states that the Madoff Securities does not required to submit the peer review program to AICPA as Friehling, had recorded that he did not perform or conduct any audits.
Recommendation
1. The policy execution for the exchange of the information among the two firms would be useful to detect the fraud.
2. The PCAOB should spend more resources an attending the hotline of whistle blowing through executing the policies which need certain complaints to be addressed effectively.
3. The firms or company should have done more in order to verify the financial statements assertions, which surrounds the investments. The PCAOB need to execute the policy that require the companies (such as Madoff Securities) to correctly answer the inquiries of the auditor.
George H.W. Bush firmly said, "Read my lips: no new taxes."
He would continue to be troubled by the words. The top tax rate was increased from 28% under Ronald Reagan to 31% by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990.
What is Tax??
In order to ensure that taxpayers are paying the proper amount of tax at the proper time and obtaining the proper tax allowances and tax reliefs, tax compliance refers to both policy actions and individual behaviour. A tax is a mandatory financial charge or some other type of levy imposed on a taxpayer (A person or legal entity) is used by a government organisation to pay for government expenses and other public expenditures (regional, local, or national). Around 3000–2800 BC, the first recorded taxation was enacted in ancient Egypt. Non-compliance with the law includes failing to pay on time as well as evading or resisting taxation. Taxes can be paid in cash or in the labour equivalent and can be either direct or indirect.
To learn more about Tax
brainly.com/question/26316390
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
Answer:
$81.52
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to state the price to pay for a stock at this present day.
To calculate this, we compute it mathematically.
Mathematically, we have;
dividend/(1+required return rate)^year
we then add together
we have
=3/(1.12) + 4.25/(1.12)^2 + 6/(1.12)^3 + 100/(1.12)^3 = 81.52
