The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820, and established the 36°30′ north line of latitude as the boundry - States south of this would be slave states, states north of it (With the exception of Missouri) would be free states.
This became problematic, however, as several issues came up, such as:
A) A movement to let the states decide for themselves, which turned out to be what was done and the Missouri Compromise was repealed in 1857, (it actually was ruled as Unconstitutional in Dred Scott vs Sandford)
B) California - It's in the middle and on both sides of the line, and it was admitted as a Free State in the Compromise of 1850, which, more or less repealed the Missouri Compromise as the rules it establishes were thrown out, a deal was made establishing California as a free state in return for a slave Texas and a stricter fugitive slave law.
Answer:
Los emperadores Licinio y Constantino daban ese “Edicto de Milán”, ... cimientos del poder temporal que pasados los años tendría la Iglesia.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Economic support for slaveholders and the education of free blacks
Explanation:
the abolitionists had the general idea that all human beings are born free and we die free, they wanted total abolition in the USA, but they clashed on issues about remuneration for slavers for losing their slaves, given that some were opposed to the state having that to pay something to them and about education they thought it was not necessary since they could be able to the power that they had already achieved as citizens
Answer:
leaving people in Benghazi
Explanation:
