Answer: D) the representation of states in Congress.
<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both dealt with </em><em> the representation of states in Congress.
</em>
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Answer: An empirical generalization
Explanation:
An empirical generalization in research, is an inference made after observing the relationship between two or more variables under different conditions.
In a research, this is the step after hypothesis and observation. The first step here is a question about correlation of fear of crime and police presence in a community. By proving that there is no relationship between these two variables, the researcher can move on to theory building where he/she reconciles their discoveries and knowledge of related fields.
If you are declared guilty of a crime without being given a trial, you can state congress has given you :
Habeas Corpus
hope this helps
The correct answer is employee withdrawal.
Employee withdrawal refers to the phenomenon in which low job satisfaction and/or strained relationships with <span>co-workers</span> lead to poor performance in employees along with other withdrawal behaviors. Withdrawn employees tend to arrive to work late, procrastinate at work, and take more days off. Employee withdrawal harms an organization by resulting in lower levels of productivity and higher employee turnover, which in turn costs an organization a significant amount.
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that according to Oscar Lewis’s research he suggests that poor people's lifestyles and ways of thinking perpetuate poverty into the next generation. This is because they are accustomed to their way of life and pass their teachings on to the next generation, but this causes a cycle of poverty.
