Answer:
Effort to aid in the constuction of rail road and also provided land from the public
Explanation:
a. ONE major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that David M. Potter described the Civil War as an inevitable event given the institutionalized sectionalism between the North and the South. On the other hand, Michael F. Holt held that the Civil War was an anomaly in American compromise-reaching political tradition.
b. ONE specific historical event or development during 1786-1861 that could support Potter's interpretation is the breakdown of the two-party system. This development pitted far-right democratic republicanism, which promoted white supremacy, whereas center-right republicanism accepted black equality.
Another historical development to support Potter's interpretation is that the South welcomed the Jim Crow laws and sanctioned the separation principle. On the other hand, the North sought to overturn the law and practice of separatism.
c) According to Holt, the Civil War is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise. During the Great Compromise of 1787, healthy rivalry ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Thus, David M. Potter held that the ingrained divisions between the North and the South caused the Civil War, while Michael F. Holt held that the breakdown of the two-party system occasioned the Civil War.
Learn more about the different historical interpretations of the Civil War here: brainly.com/question/11705791
The immediate cause of World War<span> I that made the aforementioned items come into play (alliances, imperialism, militarism, nationalism) was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. In June 1914, a Serbian-nationalist terrorist group called the Black Hand sent groups to assassinate the Archduke.</span>
I'm pretty sure that it is A. work against an author because it might cause readers to reject a story or its characters.
Answer:
After the French and Indian War ended in 1763, the British government began a concerted effort to gain more control over the colonies and to collect additional revenues to reduce the debt incurred during the war. The Stamp Act, passed by Parliament and signed by the king in March 1765, was one such measure.
