When it comes to Pakistani women, they fall under the gender subordination system where they still face discrimination based on the gender.
<u>Explanation:</u>
They are the victims of domestic violence, child marriages, and forced marriages. Although there have been many steps taken to improve the conditions of women in Pakistan such as denouncing honour killings, involvement of lady traffic wardens to be in charge of traffic; still cases of domestic abuse and forced marriages remain.
Social activist like Malala Yousafzai is trying her hard to bring positive changes in the lives of Pakistani women. Now more and more girls are given an opportunity to pursue their education.
Machiavelli claims for a pragmatic view of state policy.
Explanation:
Machiavelli's claim in the passage is that leaders must
instill fear into the society or the place that they have conquered only then will they be able to hold it.
According to him if the person is unable to hold the people with fear they will revolt sooner or later.
Machiavelli's evidence includes the fall of the city states of Italy and how the unison of other countries has been brought about by the force of some strong noble somewhere.
In the sentence "These days, parents neglect to watch their children's social media use", we find an example of the hasty generalization fallacy.
Hasty generalization does not present enough evidence to support the argument made and, therefore, generalizes a fact. In the sentence above, there is an affirmation that parents do not watch their children's social media use. How can the speaker state this? Who are these parents: all of them? Just a percentage? What about the parents who do watch their kids' use of social media? Do they not count?
As for the other options given, let's take a look at a brief description of what they mean:
Non sequitur is when a conclusion does not follow the evidence presented. It's an absurd conclusion, considering the information given. --> People like watching movies. Movies have violence. Therefore, having some violence happen to people is desirable.
Post hoc is a fallacy in which the speaker assumes there is a connection between events simply because they happened one after the other. That is, if B happened after A, then B happened because of A. --> If it rained after I had an ice cream, then it rained because I had the ice cream.
False analogy happens when the speaker analyzes two different facts under the same point of view and conditions, drawing a conclusion that is far-fetched. --> Monica is from South America. Alice is also from South America. Therefore, Monica and Alice are from the same country.
