Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Any source in History can be biased. It can be based on personal opinion, pressure, etc.
Let's take an example. Let's say we want to learn more about Hitler, and we have a primary source that we are analysing. The primary source is a diary entry from a Nazi propagandist, and in the diary entry he talks about how Hitler is like a reincarnation of God, he will lead Germany and the world to greatness and is all in all a great guy.
Straight away, you can tell that that is biased.
So to summarise, anything can be biased. It isn't related to what type of source it is. If you want to analyse and interpret sources, you will need to have lots of different primary and secondary sources at hand, and compare them to find the best answer and analysis.
Hope this helps
Answer:
D. They valued education and intellect.
Explanation:
The beginning of Rome is set back in eight century B. C. The first ruler to rule Rome was Romulus. The empire grew vast. Rome was ruled by seven kings.
Rome became a powerful empire as they had the latest technology that no other empire had. They even developed its city by building paved roads, bathhouses. The empire had also built an advanced irrigation system.
The Romans had an excellent soldiers. The army of Rome had vast numbers of soldiers and that also in legions. A legion usually have 4000-6000 soldiers each. These legion soldiers had advanced weapons with them namely, gladius or the sword, pugio or the dagger, and pilum or the spear.
The reason why the Roman empire was so powerful was because of its armors and army.
So, the correct answer is option D.
Answer:
C. approve loans is the correct answer.
Explanation:
B. The government gets its power from the consent of the people it governs.
