Answer:
By experiencing it directly
Explanation:
He leaves the astronomer's class to go look at the stars himself, which he found to be a better experience then just listening to someone talk about them.
I'd choose this dialogue to revise your sentence:
<span>“Did you hear?” I asked them. “My painting got selected! Exciting, right?” I smiled. “Especially given that I felt so incompetent at the beginning and that the competition was ruthless!”
</span>
It feels like the option that best uses the dialogue to improve this sentence, because the other options are either too informal or just the same sentence as the original one.
An evaluative thesis from the following options is "Keeping a regular schedule is so much better than letting each day's schedule be different and random".
A claim that expresses an opinion about the subject, on the other hand, is one that elicits criticism is an evaluative thesis. It renders a decision. It declares that one subject is superior to or inferior to another. The opinion expressed in option B, which illustrates an evaluative thesis, is that adhering to a schedule is preferable to following a random timetable.
The language used in the abovementioned statement is provoking which is a feature of an evaluative thesis.
Thus, the correct option is B.
To learn more about evaluative thesis here
brainly.com/question/28014427
#SPJ1
Answer: Rainsford's conflict with nature occurs early on, when the ship begins to sink. Not only does the water threaten him, but the dark of night makes it harder for him to see where he's going or what's happening: hough there are elements of a man versus self conflict within Rainsford.
Explanation: he external conflict is the fight between General Zaroff and his captive Rainsford. The internal conflict is Rainsford's recognition that there is a fine line between the hunter and the hunted.
