If im thinking of the right question from edgenuity the right answer should be D)Sparta was an oligarchy; Athens was a democracy.
Answer:
The limits placed on the Federal Government are:
1) No exercise of powers not delegated to it by the Constitution.
2) No payment from the Treasury except under appropriations made by law.
3) All duties and excises must be uniform throughout the United States.
4) No tax or duty to be laid on articles exported from any state.
5) No appointment of a senator or representative to any civil office which was created while he was a member of Congress or for which the amount of compensation was increased during that period.
6) No preferences to the ports of one state over another in regulation or tax collection.
7) No titles of nobility to be granted by the U.S. government, or permitted to be granted to government officials by foreign states.
8) No bill of attainder or ex post facto law to be passed.
This is known as the Peasant Revolt
In June rebels from Esscex and Kent marched toward London. On the 13th the Kentish men, under Wat Tyler, entered London, where they murdered some Flemish farmers.
Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
They both had
priests
officials
traders
craftsmen
farmers
slaves
laborers
warriors
