Explanation: When the price of gold an input used in the production of processors increases, it leads to a rise in the cost of producing processors. As a result of this, producers will cut down their production and decrease supply. The supply curve for processors will shift upward to the left from S1 to S2 leading to a rise in the price of processors from P1 to P2 and a fall in the quantity of processors being sold in the market from Q1 to Q2.
Answer: A - Rapid elasticity
Explanation: Rapid elasticity is a cloud computing term for scalable provisioning, or the ability to provide scalable services. It allows users to automatically request additional space in the cloud or other types of services.
Those who provide guidelines for cloud computing recommend tools like monitoring and audit trails to tightly control all of the diverse requests and transactions that happen in the provision of cloud services, and the rapid elasticity that provides so much benefit to those who use the cloud.
It false that the causes of a problem can always possible to identify completely.
<h3>What is problem solving?</h3>
This is defined as the process of finding solution to a task that seems difficult. It is a skill, hence applied after a problem has been identified.
Hence, It false that the causes of a problem can always possible to identify completely.
Learn more about problem solving here : brainly.com/question/23945932
#SPJ4
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Jones is liable to pay.
He is liable to pay to the tune of $1000. This may be negotiated however if it is not fair.
Explanation:
See the following points
- The question above is an example of Implied At-law contracts. (We will get to the definition of this in a bit).
- A contract is a legally binding agreement that recognises and governs the rights and duties of the parties to the agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the requirements and approval of<u> the Law</u>. From the above definition it is clear that two people may actually be engaging in a contract without knowing it.
- The law defines that a contract is.
- Contracts may be Express or Implied.
- Express contracts are simply contracts that are stated expressly, or openly, in either writing or orally, at the time of contract formation.
- Implied contracts are created when two or more parties have no written contract.
- There are two types of implied contracts:
- Implied In-Fact Contracts: these are contracts which create an obligation between the parties based on the facts of the situation. For example, assume your neighbor hires you to wash his car every Friday for the entire holidays. You wash your neighbor’s car for the first four weekends of the holidays and get paid on Friday morning each time. The fifth Friday you wash the car and when you arrive at your neighbor’s house for your pay, your neighbor refuses to pay you. The law will infer that there is a contract between you and your neighbor, even though you never put anything in writing. This is an implied in-fact contract.
2. The other type of Implied contract is that which is Implied At-Law
In the case between Jones and Smith, the law imposes a duty to perform a contract, and will enforce such a contract even against a person’s will, where the situation is such that without this legal intervention, one party would be <u>unfairly enriched</u> or advantaged by another party’s action.
- In the question above, Smith is a CPA. He is qualified in every respect to carry out Professional Tax services. His services may be relied upon with a great degree of confidence.
- If Jones had not filed those tax returns, he probably would have lost monies that should have accrued to him from the government.
This type of agreement is also considered a quasi-contract. A quasi-contract occurs where the law imposes an obligation upon the parties where in fact the parties did not intend to enter into a contract and made no promise to perform.
However, because one party would be unjustly enriched by another party’s action, the beneficiary of those actions must make restitution or pay fair value for the services provided, even though there was never any intention to enter into an agreement.
Cheers!
