<span>For statement 1; Government provided housing, this may be costly but the way that the people are provided with houses can decrease the number of homeless people. For statement 2; Tax deductions to renters, this has been going on for thousand years, taxes are used to provide services to people if the government properly used it. For statement 3; Tax breaks to construction companies who provide affordable housing, this is common to developers who intend to maximize their profit and the available area for people whose income is not that high. I would suggest statement 3.</span>
These results are evidence of
"<span>
the endowment effect".</span>
The endowment effect<span>, in behavioral finance<span>, portrays a situation in which an individual qualities
something that they officially possess more than something that they don't yet
claim. Studies have indicated over and again that individuals will esteem
something that they effectively claim more to a comparable thing they don't
possess. It doesn't make a difference if the thing being referred to was bought
or gotten as a gift, the impact still stays.</span></span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Law of demand.
Explanation:
The law of demand establishes an inverse relationship between the quantity demanded of goods and services and their price. If the price increases, the quantity demanded will decrease (<em>the demand curve moves to the left</em>). In case the price decreases, the quantity demanded will increase (<em>the demand curve moves to the right</em>).
bro there is no items in you question fix it and i'll answer bro
Answer:
1. He has not developed the idea yet
2. His employer knows he his a pacifist so he has the delima is he ethically correct to not develop a product that can be used for warfare.
Explanation:
In this scenario Ben signed an agreement with his employer that all ideas he has developed on the job and while working with the company is a property of the company.
This is a common agreement that gives a company property rights over work developed by their employees.
However since Ben is a pacifist he has an ethical dilemma when he has an idea that can weaponize an ultrasonic range-finding device.
He is justifying his decision by saying the idea has not been developed yet and his employer will not expect him to develop such technology since he is a pacifist.