The answer to this question is the word "OFFENSIVE". This word can be used instead of the word "objectionable". When we say objectionable, this term also has the same meaning with "offensive" or something that shows opposition over something. Either word, both convey the same meaning.
Brutus and Cassius quarrel. Brutus accuses Cassius of having an itching palm which means he has taken some bribe in place of homage to power. Cassius is heartbroken to think that his dear friend Brutus is angry with him.
During the quarrel, the truth of Brutus' bad temperament is revealed. His precious Portia is dead. She has swallowed hot coals and killed herself.
Brutus has lost the most precious gift in his life. He has lost his beloved wife. He has no will to go on. He might as well be dead along with Portia. Through his grief, Cassius' faults are magnified. After much discourse, quarreling, Brutus admits his reason for being so indignant.
Cassius realizes that Brutus is commenting out of anger, hurt, and bereavement at losing his wife.
Brutus decides to put his anger aside and offers Cassius wine. The two share wine and a handshake. In the face of death, the two breach their divisions.
Cassius and Brutus have argued out of fear and grief. They reunite due to the fact that they are in this situation due to honorable qualities. They both desire that Rome 's countrymen be free from slavery.
Caesar had to die. Now Brutus and Cassius face death for protecting Rome from Caesar's ambition.
Brutus could resent Cassius for persuading him to take action against Caesar.
Was Caesar's death in vain? Will Brutus and Cassius lose the war? In death, Brutus and Cassius have reunited.
Answer:
What does this passage mean? --> Reading
What do I already know about this subject? ---> Pre-reading
What have I learned? ---> Post-reading
The inferences that can be made about the setting are:
- It is a work environment.
- It is daytime.
- The room holds several people.
<h3>What do you mean by
inference?</h3>
The inference refers to the use of remark and historical past to attain a logical conclusion. You in all likelihood practice inference each day.
For example, in case you see a person consuming a new food and she or he makes a face, then you definitely infer he does now no longer like it.
The missing information in the question:
Read the excerpt from Iqbal.
Suddenly I realized that I had to get back to work. My mind had wandered. Just in time, I managed to recapture a thread I was about to lose. Then the sunbeams were blocked and the two swords of light stopped fighting. We all turned around to see the master standing in the doorway. His big body filled it. He was dressed for traveling, with a long coat that almost reached his feet and boots covered with red dust.
Thus, The inferences that can be made about the setting are:
- It is a work environment.
- It is daytime.
- The room holds several people.
Learn more about Inference in English here:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
b. "the work was governed by extremely tight, rigid discipline"
f. "careful organization did not solve the second problem with sugar"
Explanation:
i feel like those two answer would be the best options