The Radical Republicans’ goals included all of the following except:

1 answer:

4 0

The Radical Republicans were a faction of American politicians within the Republican Party of the United States from around 1854 (before the American Civil War) until the end of Reconstruction in 1877. They called themselves "Radicals", with a goal of immediate, complete, permanent eradication of slavery, without compromise. They were opposed during the War by the moderate Republicans (led by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln), and by the pro-slavery and anti-Reconstruction Democratic Party as well as liberals in the Northern United States during Reconstruction. Radicals led efforts after the war to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation. After weaker measures in 1866 resulted in violence against former slaves in the rebel states, Radicals pushed the Fourteenth Amendment and statutory protections through Congress. They disfavored allowing ex-Confederate officers to retake political power in the Southern United States, and emphasized equality, civil rights and voting rights for the "freedmen", i.e. people who had been enslaved by state slavery laws within the United States.[1]

During the war, Radical Republicans opposed Lincoln's initial selection of General George B. McClellan for top command of the major eastern Army of the Potomac and Lincoln's efforts in 1864 to bring seceded Southern states back into the Union as quickly and easily as possible. Lincoln later recognized McClellan's weakness and relieved him of command. The Radicals passed their own Reconstruction plan through Congress in 1864, but Lincoln vetoed it and was putting his own policies in effect as military commander-in-chief when he was assassinated in April 1865.[2] Radicals pushed for the uncompensated abolition of slavery, while Lincoln wanted to pay slave owners who were loyal to the Union. After the war, the Radicals demanded civil rights for freed slaves, including measures ensuring suffrage. They initiated the various Reconstruction Acts as well as the Fourteenth Amendment and limited political and voting rights for ex-Confederate civil officials and military officers. They keenly fought Lincoln's successor, Andrew Johnson, a former slave owner from Tennessee who favored allowing Southern states to decide the rights and status of former slaves. After Johnson vetoed various congressional acts favoring civil rights for former slaves, they attempted to remove him from office through impeachment, which failed by one vote in 1868.

You might be interested in

What made the knights of labor so successful in bringing workers together

Nady [450]

Answer:

they basically worked together and killed everyone

Explanation:

And I don't know the explanation

3 0

3 years ago

The party in power tends to lose seats in off-year elections because

agasfer [191]

Answer: voters want to show support for the President.voters are reacting to the President's policies the coattail effect has worn off by then.

Explanation:
hope this helps:)

:3 have a good day or a beautiful day:3

8 0

2 years ago

What can we understand about prithvi narayan Shah as a person from the fact that he respected common people's view like bise nag

Deffense [45]

Answer:

we can understand the kind and humble nature of Prithvi Narayan shah can be felt when he has followed the advice of Bise Nagarchi. We can also comprehend that he is a far-sighted person and respect others even though he was a king.

5 0

2 years ago

Drag each tile to the correct box. Not all tiles will be used

hodyreva [135]

1. First Battle of Bull Run,
2. Battle of Antietam
3. Battle of Gettysburg
4. Sherman's March to the sea

3 0

2 years ago

In order to overcome his greatest obstacle to implementing his New Deal reform measures, President Franklin D. Roosevelt attempt

denpristay [2]

Answer:

increase the size of the Supreme Court so that he could appoint justices who would supply rulings favorable to him

Explanation:

The US Supreme Court first provoked public protests when, in May 1935, during an unprecedented economic crisis, the NIRA (National Industrial Recovery Act), which entered into force on June 16, 1933, was declared unconstitutional. This act became part of the New Deal of Roosevelt to save the country. Like other laws initiated by Roosevelt and adopted during the first “100 days,” the NIRA was extraordinary, well thought out and had one goal - to prevent huge social shocks that could cause an economic crisis at any moment. It was no accident that he was enthusiastically perceived by both businessmen and ordinary workers and employees of America.

However, the laws of the “New Deal” were literally passed in the 'fire order,' with the procedure for adoption curtailed, so the judges of the Armed Forces had arguments to declare them incompatible with the US Constitution. In January 1936, the Supreme Court’s decision abolished the AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act) system, which was designed to save and restore the country's agriculture - imposing a tax on firms processing agricultural products, which, according to the judges of the Supreme Court, was contrary to the constitution.

In total, from January 1935 to May 1936, the US Supreme Court declared 11 laws that were passed by Congress in 1933-1934 as unconstitutional. The most important changes introduced by the New Deal in the life of American society were threatened, which caused widespread discontent among the population. The actions of the Supreme Court were opposed by the organized labor movement of America. The "revolutionary situation" began to ripen in the country. The presidential election in 1936 was a kind of referendum in favor of the “New Deal” by Roosevelt, turning the Supreme Court into an object of sharp criticism from the indignant public. Under these conditions, on February 5, 1937, Roosevelt sent a message to Congress on the plan of reform of the Supreme Court, which provided for a significant expansion of its composition. Although Congress did not accept the draft, it became apparent that the Supreme Court could no longer remain in its original position. Soon, the judges of the Supreme Court recognized the National Act on Labor Relations as constitutional. In May 1937, the Constitutional Law on Social Insurance was also successfully tested for constitutionality, and in 1939, also the Law on the Regulation of Agriculture of 1938. In essence, under pressure from the public, a legal 'amnesty' for the New Deal's socio-economic reforms took place.

3 0

3 years ago