Answer: No, it wouldn’t be a work of art.
Explanation: It wouldn’t be a work of Art because the artistic value is lost since the art loses its subjectivity. When the Artist work was allowed to hang in a public space, it had boundaries and was defined by no rules. It was a beautiful fusion of art and design viewed by all. Design and Art is objective; it’s primary function is to express the imagination in non grammatical ways. Those ways are determined by the artists and those that view it.
If this piece of work belonged to a corporation, it would lose its power of reflection and instead the corporation it belonged to would be in charge of allowing the art piece to reflect or convey a new form of visual rhetoric. This new framework would allow the corporation to communicate their own message, idea, or point of view. Which no longer makes it subjective.
Sure I can help you if you really think about it all of it means just ANB
Answer:
Mozart irritated the people he worked for so much he was be fired. He also was suspected to be a gambler, and he had many health issues due to his rough childhood. Beethoven was divorced which left him financially unstable, not to mention that he ALSO had a multitude of health issues.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>A</em><em> </em><em>photograph</em><em> </em><em>or</em><em> </em><em>picture</em><em> </em><em>developed</em><em> </em><em>or</em>
<em>executed</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>black</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>white</em><em> </em><em>or</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>varying</em>
<em>tones</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>only</em><em> </em><em>one</em><em> </em><em>color</em>
<em>please</em><em> </em><em>mark</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>brainist</em>
<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>:</em><em>)</em>
I think it may be a logo?
