I think the answer is: <span>Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
This section is really important because In real-life scenario, many situations may arise that require the combination more than one military branches. For example, in military battles that happened in the middle of Ocean, the combination of both Air force and the Marine corp is crucial to achieve the upper hand in the battle. </span>
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
the first question is, Arabs and Jews both claimed the lands of Jerusalem
for the second its, Location of Religous and Ethnic groups
It shouldn't but sadly it still does in this day and age
It is False for other places <span>had severe economic problems.</span>
