1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sweet-ann [11.9K]
4 years ago
8

Based on what you know of the situation, what arguments could be made against holding suspects without allowing for a proper tri

al? What argument could be made for holding suspected terrorists without formally charging them with crimes and giving them a day in US court?
History
2 answers:
AlladinOne [14]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A good answer should contain the following:

Possible Answers:

Arguments against

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

Explanation:

Naddik [55]4 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.


As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about

You might be interested in
WOULD YOU HAVE BEEN A FEDERALIST OR A Democratic Republican
Igoryamba

Answer:

I would have been a Democractic-Republican because I support having a strong government. If the States had too much power, then there would be fighting over land, taxes, people, etc. The government supports the States, the people, and protects the United States from imploding.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What might cause individuals to use terror tactics to bring about change?
ahrayia [7]
Those individuals use terror tactics to create an impression that the Government could not protect the people. A successful terror attack will undermine the capabilities of that country's defense officials and cause fear throughout its people, which really works in favor if the terrorists
5 0
3 years ago
Where does the Supreme Court derive its power and authority?
tamaranim1 [39]

Option B is correct. The Supreme Court of the United States derives its power and authority from Article III, section I.

<h3>Which court has the most power?</h3>

In the United States, the supreme court is a superior court. Article III of the United States constitution grants the authority to establish a court and authorizes Congress to enact legislation establishing a system of lower courts.

Thus, the supreme court is a superior court, supreme court derives its power, and authority from Article III, section I.

Learn more about the Supreme Court here:

brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
What is a similarity between the ancient Maya and the European settlers
VARVARA [1.3K]

i do not know the answer yet but i will give it to you

8 0
3 years ago
5. The struggle for civil rights by minority groups in the United States has
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

The struggle for civil rights by minority groups.

Explanation:

America had always been a place for people from Europe, Africa, Asia, and Hispanics. There have been movements for equal rights in society by the minority group, including blacks and Hispanics. African American often faced racial violence and discrimination. The Civil Rights Movement involved many different plans and methods, including legal action and nonviolent civil disobedience. The Latin Americans civil rights struggle did not begin in 1903.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does louisiana have a french speaking heritage?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the causes, course, and consequences (industrial growth, subsequent effect on children and women) of New England's texti
    12·1 answer
  • In which excerpt from Harriet Tubman:Conductor on the Underground Railroad is Tubman using pathos? ​
    9·1 answer
  • Cases that involve a violation of a ?
    9·1 answer
  • The advantages of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg
    15·1 answer
  • The Articles of Confederation allowed Congress to: make and borrow money. declare war. create a postal service. All of these cho
    15·2 answers
  • How is an executive agreement different from a treaty?
    7·1 answer
  • What group spread Roman culture more than any other did? A Roman legions B Roman senate C Roman explorers D Roman philosophers
    11·1 answer
  • Whitch political group became increasingly popular in Germany after World War I
    7·2 answers
  • What was the reaction of American citizens on Vietnamization?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!