Answer:
Historians might not exactly know "simply as it happened"
Explanation:
For starters, a historian might not know exactly how it happened or simply as it happened, therefore who cannot require them to. If we did we would get inaccurate accounts that wouldn't be beneficial.
For example, the federal government place condition of building new hospitals for granting federal funds.
Explanation:
Most taxpayers believed that state-level taxes may be the only source of government revenue, but it's essential to mention but they're not the only source of state income. State governments also receive a considerable amount of federal government assistance in terms of grants and aids. Federal assistance is being given to states for medicare beneficiaries, education, transportation, and other means-tested welfare programs.
The federal government adds these types of requirements to make sure that the assistance would actually be used for the true purpose and the state government remained accountable for it. The ultimate purpose of these grants was to support those states whose revenue could not cope up with the state requirements or for the bigger projects.
The fact that both Egypt and Kush had traditional economies means that the economies of both civilizations depended primarily on agriculture.
<h2>
Answer: konteksto? </h2>
Explanation:
hindi ko alam kung ano ang ibig mong sabihin
Answer:
This clause states that the United States Congress shall have power
•To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and
• To regulate commerce among the several States,
• and to regulate commerce with the Indian Tribes.
Explanation:
The Commerce Clause describes an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."
The framers believe the clause was necessary so as to make"normal" or "regular" commerce between different state; hence, it was designed to further promote trade and exchange and not to limit, hinder or restrict it.
Also, it was necessary so as to aim at preventing states from enacting obstructions and restraints to the free flow of "commerce" such as quotas and taxes, and tariffs.
