<u>Answer:
</u>
We can get society to see the dangers of our hazardous inventions that would be uncontrollable once left to the environment by carrying out and recording the results of controlled experiments using miniature specimens of the hazardous inventions.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- It is crucial that we realize that some inventions made by humans can prove fatal for the entire mankind if they go out of control or fall into wrong hands.
- In order to make the governments of various nations stop sponsoring such developments and put restrictions on the developments being done by others, it is necessary to pose a popular outcry by majority populations supporting it.
Answer:
reform the covenant
Explanation:
The given case relates to anti- competitive laws / anti-trust laws. For an active-market economy, antitrust laws guarantee fair competition. Such regulations have developed alongside the economy, protecting carefully towards would-be monopoly power and disturbances to the efficient ebbs and flows of competitiveness. Thus, court can cancel or reform such a covenant if it comes under the preview of anti- trust law.
A few different results are: The Irish blamed the English for the lack of help.
The Irish broke away from the Roman Catholic Church.
Cognitive Dissonance is a False theory termed for the given scenario. The correct term for the given scenario is Drive reduction Theory.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Cognitive dissonance refers to someone's behaviour conflicts with their beliefs or attitudes which does not matches with the given scenario.
The drive reduction theory describes people’s drive or motivation to satisfy their desires. This drive or desire create arousal and tension emanating from biological or physiological needs. It means that people often experience drive or desires that increases negative needs.
Furthermore, unsatisfied desire also creates tension or unpleasant feeling that need to be reduced. The only thing that lowers the drivers is if one satisfy their needs or desire. As in the question, when we deny our sugar craving, it simply doesn’t go away, it builds up until it is satisfied.
I believe the answer is: <span>enough statistical support for the research hypothesis when there is not
In statistic terms, a type I error refers to the occurrence of "false positive" findings.
A false positive often happen when we do not have enough subjects which make us believe the data that we took from a small sample represent the true condition outside the research.</span><span />