Jefferson's quote will be an example of propaganda if it influences the reader to agree with a statement, without using evidence, but using persuasive, sentimental, and manipulative elements.
<h3>What is propaganda?</h3>
- It is a form of persuasion.
- It is the ability to convince people to support opinions, beliefs, and precepts.
Propaganda is a way of manipulating the public to support a particular speaker. This speaker presents a statement, without showing logical evidence that proves why that statement is correct and reliable.
However, this speaker uses emotional, religious, psychological, or any other element capable of manipulating the audience dishonestly.
An example of this can be seen in a person who claims that vaccines cause disease because God did not show in the Holy Bible that people should be vaccinated. This person did not use scientific evidence to confirm his claim but used religious elements to manipulate a Christian audience into supporting him.
Unfortunately, you didn't show which Jefferson quote your question refers to. This left your question incomplete and it was not possible to find the complete version of it, which prevents me from providing an objective answer. However, I hope this information will help you find that answer.
Learn more about propaganda:
brainly.com/question/21860449
#SPJ1
It was pesident Franklin D. Roosevelt who took the first steps to reach racial equality, but they were not enought. Nevertheless, during the period of president Harry S. Truman great efforts were made in this direction. Truman established a committee on Civil Rights. This was not well seen by the southern Democrats who <em>opposed firmly to the new civil rights</em>. They decided to form a new party, called <em>Dixiecrats</em>, an extremely (racially) conservative party. They even <em>intended to reach the White House</em>, naming a presidential candidate in 1948, however, they <em>did not successed</em>.
sigurd is a legendery hero who killed a dragon and was murdered later Sigurd is a brave and fearless person.
Answer:
He argued that by unleashing competition, free trade was likely to drive down workers' wages
Explanation:
Marx also disputed the argument that free trade facilitated a natural division of labour between countries. The free traders failed to understand that "one country can grow rich at the expense of another
This is the law of supply
