Answer:
<u>Effective:</u>
- A fence will increase the safety of our children.
- Building a fence will protect the park property and equipment.
- The cost can be offset of fundraisers such as bake sales and car washes.
<u>Ineffective:</u>
- Many neighborhoods nearby have a fence.
- The fence will be several feet long.
- The fence may be expensive to install.
Explanation:
It is important that the speaker includes strong arguments for building a park fence. In this light, he argues that the fence makes the children more safe, which is probably the greatest advantage of it. By stating the advantages of building a park fence, the speaker draws the attention of the audience. If he focused mainly on the disadvantages, the speech would not be effective.
The correct answer is letter D: <span>a note from a traveler who had gone on the marked trail, telling them to take a different and safer route if they could.
The Donner Party was a group of American Pioneers who headed out to California and followed a different route by wagons. They ended up being stuck in the blizzard, resulting to the lost of their supplies and eventually into cannibalism. Along the trail they saw letters stuck in trees that they need to take a different and safer route in order for them to get where they are headed, but the group did not heed the message and still pursued their path which lead to their own demise.</span>
Police brutality, highlights of your high school year, something you want to do to change the world for the better
<span>Whereas prejudice consists of beliefs, and discrimination is characterized by actions.
So, the option B is correct. beliefs; actions
Prejudice is a negative attitude or disposition you have for other people on the basis of race, ethnicity etc
And discrimination is an action or practice or anything what you do.</span>
The rhetorical features beginning with line 32 is that Stanton's point of view were grounded in natural rights. She assimilated and combined petitions and pleas to women's moral authority making it evolving a complicated, complex and entwined philosophy of gender dissimilarities.
