1. I believe the answer is: B.It helps people interpret the past, understand the present, and prepare for the future.
Geographical occurrences (such as earthquakes) tend to possess several signs that make it possible for humans to predict future occurrences. By analysing the occurrences in the past, we can predict when next one would occurs, the damage that it cause, and the things that we can do to survive.
2. I believe the answer is: Regions are always unchanging and distinct in nature.
Regions are constantly changing due to natural factors and the activities by organisms who live in it. For example, the rising temperature cause the ice to melt and ended the ice age (natural factors) , or factories that built by humans made the water resources in a certain region become consumables (activities caused by those who lived in the region)
3. I believe the answer is: c. the world in spatial terms
the world in spatial terms associated geographic tools to collect information of location, place, and region in order to organize and characterize them. The characterization would make it easier for people to identify geological occurrence that happen in the past and enable us to make prediction of the occurrences that might occurs in the future.
Answer:
No it is not fair for monopolies to exist.
Explanation:
They create privatization of the land and work, which controls the means of production while exploiting peoples labor. Monopolies contribute to capitalism, as the saying goes, "the rich get richer and the poorer get poorer."
Unrest begins in south central la on April 29 after a trial jury acquitted four and stuff
Standards of weights and measures.
Hope this helps!
Answer and Explanation:
A. An claim that can be found in the text is that women, unlike men, had to adopt heavier working hours, as they had to work both outside the home (to meet the demand of capitalism), as they had to work inside the house, assuming long and exhausting working hours, as domestic work continued to be done by them. This can be seen in the lines "[...] but to an expanded dependence on the market labor of women, performed both within and outside the household."
C. The text shows that the beginning of capitalism did not exclude women from the labor market, but became dependent on them. We can refute this argument, showing that in the first half of the 19th century, women received much lower wages than men and needed authorization from their father or husband to work, in addition to having no labor support in case of pregnancy or accidents, which shows that there was, in fact, a discouragement and an attempt to stop women in the work market.
