Answer:
A short thrust into Union territory would not be enough; a protracted stay would be the key to Confederate success. Lee hoped to keep his army on United States soil through much of the autumn, not with the intention of capturing and holding territory but with an eye toward accomplishing several goals before returning.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Homestead Act was a law of the United States of America created by President Abraham Lincoln on May 20, 1862. Large contingents of immigrants from Europe participated in the occupation of the vast west of the United States and without them this achievement would not lead to cape. To attract immigrants, the US government UU decreed in 1862, the Homestead Act, which defines the ownership of a property of 65 hectares to those who cultivate it for five years. Anyone who had never taken up arms against the US government. The US, including freed slaves, could file a claim for a federal land grant. This law greatly increased the flow of European immigrants to the United States. The conquest of the West, which began with the purchase of Louisiana and ended with the purchase of southern Arizona in 1853, coincided with the US industrialization period.
Although this law was very beneficial for the USA, they also produced many problems between the Native Americans and the new settlers, this problem was solved later with the relocation of the natives in different reserves.
The Wilmot Proviso pointed to trouble ahead in the debate over the expansion of slavery.
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate. The high-intensity debate over slavery and the expansion of slavery was evidenced by how things went with the "Wilmot Proviso."
Can we please see the choices, without them i won't be able to help you
The correct answer is A. Interview more soldiers who fought during the battle and compare their answers
Explanation:
In general terms, historical events can be better understood by using firs-hand accounts or primary sources. This means to know what happened at an event the best is to look for documents or sources made by those who directly experienced the events, which includes testimonies. In this context, the best for this historian is to interview soldiers who participated in the battle and use this information to better understand the story, including which side fired first (Option A.)
