The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there no options attached or any specific reading, we can say the following.
The key ideals and provisions of the tribal treaties of this era (such as the Point No Point Treaty), were the displacement of the Native American Indians tribes from their territories to support white settlement, as was the case of the Point No Point Treaty that was signed on January 26, 1855.
Let'set this case as an example. Isaac Stevens was the Governor of the Washington territory. He wanted the land of the Kitsap Peninsula. So he had to negotiate a deal with three different tribes; the Skokomish, the S'Klallam, and the Chimakum. The Native American Indian tribe's leaders expressed their concerns and were reluctant to accept. Stevens had to give them a reservation with fishing and hunting rights, where they could grow crops and live with their families, in exchange for that Kitsap territory.
They had no rights due to the fact that they were slaves.
The coalition forces that fought on the side of Kuwait consisted of Kuwait forces, the United States forces, the United Kingdom forces, the French forces, and the army of Saudi Arabia. It was odd to have this coalition for many people because of the support of Saudi Arabia, as well as the support that Europeans gave to the Kuwait forces.
The Catholic Church became corrupted, due to its overgrown power. Because of the Pope's overspendings, the Pope started the Sales of Indulgences. The Sales of Indulgences was a scheme to earn more money. It made people spend money so that they/family members go into heaven. This upsetted a reformer, Martin Luther. That started the Reformation. So in summery, the Catholic Church gained to much power ( more than the nobility) and it wanted more money. BTW, this only a little bit of it.
