“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer: Competence
Explanation: Competence is showcased when an individual demonstrates a reasonable level of expertise in a particular art enabling such person to perform efficiently. In the scenario above, Marcia could be described as being competent as she was able to put her acquired coding skill to use while solving a real world problem. Learning a skill or various skills doesn't define competence, however, the ability to put such skills into real world usage defines the level of competence of such individual.
Answer:
Below are some of the best ways to better protect the confidential information that your business handles.
Control access. ...
Use confidential waste bins and shredders. ...
Lockable document storage cabinets. ...
Secure delivery of confidential documents. ...
Employee training.
Explanation:
Answer:
Ok HEAR ME OUT THERE IS NO WAY IM DOING THIS
Explanation:
The answer for that question is c
