Question

How does judicial activism compare to judicial restraint?

Answer 1

Answer:

Judicial activism is essentially the opposite of judicial restraint.

If a court is exercising judicial activism, it means the court is actively making rulings that will change the laws that have been established by other branches of government, and even sometimes by other courts. The use of the word activism refers to the belief that the judges who behave in this manner are serving as activists who are pushing forward personal or political agendas.

Judicial restraint, on the other hand, means that the members of the judicial branch are restraining themselves from making decisions that could end up changing policies or laws.

Explanation:

Answer 2

Judicial makes the laws and Judicial restraint limits the powers