Answer: He lacked the specific intent necessary for burglary because he believed that the bookie owed him the money.
Explanation:
Gambling can turn out sour sometimes, especially when results come out controversial. Although the defendant is not supposed to break into someone's home but according to the common law burglary he has some defense to make for himself which is he believed that the bookie owed him the money that's what he based his action for. The definition of common law burglary requires that the defendant break into the dwelling place with the intent to commit a felony. He would claim he didn't destroy any item or take more than what He was owed but just stocked to taking the money he was owed.
Depending on the context, it can either be "Imperialism" or "Colonialism", the main difference pertaining to the exploit of the lesser nation's resources.
Individualistic culture is the answer to this question. Individualistic culture is the term that best describes culture that emphasize the importance of being self-sufficient, knowing oneself, and being true to what one wants in life. It is also defined as people believe that their primary responsibilities is themselves.
