Answer:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4&19&-5\\7&0&-14\end{array}\right] + \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-8&7&0\\-1&17&6\end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&26&-5\\6&17&-8\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D4%2619%26-5%5C%5C7%260%26-14%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%2B%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-8%267%260%5C%5C-1%2617%266%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-4%2626%26-5%5C%5C6%2617%26-8%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Step-by-step explanation:
To add two matrices you just need to add the corresponding entries together. In this case, we have that:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4&19&-5\\7&0&-14\end{array}\right] + \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-8&7&0\\-1&17&6\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4-8&19+7&-5 + 0\\7-1&0+17&-14+6\end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&26&-5\\6&17&-8\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D4%2619%26-5%5C%5C7%260%26-14%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%2B%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-8%267%260%5C%5C-1%2617%266%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%3D%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D4-8%2619%2B7%26-5%20%2B%200%5C%5C7-1%260%2B17%26-14%2B6%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-4%2626%26-5%5C%5C6%2617%26-8%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Then, we conclude that the sume of the two matrices is:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4&19&-5\\7&0&-14\end{array}\right] + \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-8&7&0\\-1&17&6\end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&26&-5\\6&17&-8\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D4%2619%26-5%5C%5C7%260%26-14%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%2B%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-8%267%260%5C%5C-1%2617%266%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-4%2626%26-5%5C%5C6%2617%26-8%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Jenna is correct. This is because the square root of 2 is an irrational number. And if the number is a prime number, the answer is less likely to have a rational square root.
Answer:
1/12 0.08%
Step-by-step explanation:
*NOT POSITIVE JUST TRYING TO HELP*
Transformation.. If you're referring to geometry
Answer:
I think 10%
I am not sure
Step-by-step explanation:
if it's correct I hope it helps