Well a mutation is like a change in the DNA and so if there was a mutation in the antártica fish, something in their genes would change. If that mutation has a positive effect on it, then that mutation would be passed down to the generations of fish, helping that fish with its survival or something
Answer: It may be unethical to some people due to their beliefs. But as science evolves,genetic engineering has made it possible for us to modify many things,including human DNA. To me,changing human DNA is ethical. Changes in DNA bring many positive consequences,for example lower the risk of many deadly diseases(cancer/cystic fibrosis,etc). We can modify our features and create "a perfect human". But,there are some dangers that come with this power. For example,DNA modification could go wrong and create dangerous species
Explanation:
The answer is K-selected.
<span>The population size of K-selected species is fairly constant
in time, unlike the population size of r-selected species. r-selected species
are usually bellow carrying capacity and the population size is density
independent. On the contrary, K-selected species are usually near or at
carrying capacity and the population size is density dependent. It can be concluded that sperm whales have K-selected populations, since they </span><span>maintain their populations close to carrying capacity.</span>
The answer would be b. decreases
The uptake of carbon dioxide and the release of oxygen is essential for a plant to survive. Where and how does this gas exchange generally occur?
A. in all plant organs, as a result of cellular respiration
B. in the stems, to provide energy for lifting water
C. in the roots, to allow mineral absorption
D. in the leaves, as a result of photosynthesis
Answer D
