The price-elasticity of demand coefficient measures the percentage change in demand compared to the percentage change in price. This is on a scale up to 1, with 1 meaning the demand is perfectly elastic and every change in price results in a significant change in demand.
Answer:
a. 32 secs
b. 3.75 or 4
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
(a) Cycle Time is
= Operation time per week ÷ output per week
= (40 hours × 60 × 60) ÷ (4,500)
= 32 secs
(b) And, the Theoretical minimum number of workstations required is
= Sum of total task times ÷ cycle time
= (22 + 30 + 15 + 14 + 12 + 27) ÷ (32 sec)
= 3.75 or 4
By applying the above formulas we can get the cycle time and the theoretical minimum number of work stations
Given that: F (Future worth) = $2,500, i (nominal interest rate)
= 0.12, compounded monthly = 12 months, years of investment = 1 year, and no.
of employees = 20. Compute using the annuity formula: A=Fi/(((1+i)^n)-1).
Calculating i = 0.12/12 = 0.01, since it is compounded monthly. Calculating n
(total number of compounding) = 1 x 12 = 12, since year of investment is equal
to 1. Substituting F=2500, i=0.01 and n=12 to the annuity formula, you will get
A=$197.12. Multiply by 20, you will get $3,942.44.
Answer:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $14.77 per direct labor hour
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Estimated overhead cost for the period= $325,000
Estimated total direct labor hours for the period= 22,000
<u>To calculate the predetermined manufacturing overhead rate we need to use the following formula:</u>
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 325,000 / 22,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $14.77 per direct labor hour
Answer:
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
Explanation:
The doctrine of <em>innocent spouse relief</em> might apply here. Mrs. Jones will have to prove that:
- the income that was omitted was earned by her husband, not her.
- she must prove that when she signed the tax filings, she was not aware of the omission.
- after examining all the facts surrounding the omission, the IRS must decide that blaming her would not be fair.