1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
2 years ago
6

Refer to Passage 1 to answer this question.

English
2 answers:
deff fn [24]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Dejected

Explanation:

Considering how her life has turned out none of the others fit.

kow [346]2 years ago
3 0
Not pretty















because i ain’t neva seen two pretty best friends


one of em always gotta be ugly
You might be interested in
Do animals have souls? Explain why or why not.​
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

Animals have souls, but most Hindu scholars say that animal souls evolve into the human plane during the reincarnation process. So, yes, animals are a part of the same life-death-rebirth cycle that humans are in, but at some point they cease to be animals and their souls enter human bodies so they can be closer to God.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence most clearly uses connotation to express a feeling of fear?
Mnenie [13.5K]

B...................... Apex

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
9. You can also ask people about their hobbies. For example, ''Do you have an ………….. hobby?''
zepelin [54]

Answer:

Answer

Explanation:

uncommon

it's very easyyy

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1221
ivanzaharov [21]

Me das mas información?

7 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What interpretation of The Tempest was the same in both the Utah Valley
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP FIVE STAR AND A THANKS.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these groups of words comes second alphabetically? resident font, resource fork, removable media
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP URGENT ASAP 100 POINTS
    12·2 answers
  • How to put "My lost cat was found by my downstairs neighbor" in active voice?
    10·1 answer
  • 02.06 introduction paragraph florida virtual schools
    10·1 answer
  • Great Gatsby
    12·2 answers
  • Please write down the parts of this philanthropic chart make it realistic and it could possibly be carried out one day/// please
    13·1 answer
  • What is the central idea of "Is our gain our loss?"
    7·2 answers
  • One morning, in cool blood, I slipped a noose about its
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!