C) But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had anything to do with her. thus option C is correct.
<h3>Why British rule of American colonies?</h3>
Although each colony had its own government, the British king maintained power over them. Many colonists were irate by the 1770s because they lacked self-government. This implied that they were unable to rule themselves and establish their own rules. The king demanded that they pay enormous taxes.
According to Paine's claim in Option C, America would have actually been better off if it had not been under British rule. According to him, America's progress and ability to prosper even more were really hampered by its rule by the British. Both options A and B make the case that America needs Britain to succeed. Option A claims that for America to be happy, a relationship with Britain is crucial. America is compared to a child in Option B. According to this, a child should never consume meat if they can get by on milk alone. America should therefore just require Britain. Although Paine evidently finds this absurd, the premise does not support the claim.
Learn more about British rule here:
brainly.com/question/3203295
#SPJ1
he is going to hurt or hit the narrator with the black ball
The author’s diction contributes to the tone of the excerpt because his: Poetic diction creates a perturbed tone.
<h3>What is Poetic Diction?</h3>
Poetic diction is a choice of words that is similar to those used by poets in their poems.
In the excerpt above, we find that the speaker was poetic in his choice of words and the descriptions created through his choice of words contribute to the perturbed tone of the text.
Learn more about poetic diction here:
brainly.com/question/1826899
Answer:
B After the disruption, we left
Explanation:
A dependepent clause is a clause that provides a sentence with additional info but can't stand as a sentence
