Background- In patients with intracranial artery stenosis, a long-term advantage of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for the prevention of recurrent stroke has not been proven. We studied patients with intracranial arterial stenosis who were enrolled in the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination trial, a randomized controlled trial in high-risk Japanese patients with ischemic stroke, to compare the efficacy and safety of DAPT with cilostazol and clopidogrel or aspirin to those of SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin. Techniques and Outcomes In patients with ischemic stroke with symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis of at least 50% in a major intracranial artery, we compared the vascular and hemorrhagic events between DAPT and SAPT.
Patients were divided into two groups: 275 were given DAPT, while 272 were given SAPT. In contrast to SAPT, which had a higher risk of serious or life-threatening bleeding, DAPT had a lower risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.95); and a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular mortality (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.91). Conclusions In patients with intracranial artery stenosis following stroke, DAPT using cilostazol was superior than SAPT using clopidogrel or aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events without raising bleeding risk.
<h3>What is
stroke?</h3>
When anything prevents blood flow to a portion of the brain or when a blood artery in the brain bursts, a stroke, also known as a brain attack, happens. The brain either ages or suffers harm in both scenarios. A stroke may result in permanent brain damage, chronic disability, or even fatality.
To learn more about stroke with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/26482925
#SPJ4
This is the correct way to gather information coming straight from someone who deal with seeing the effects occasionally
Answer:
Muscle relaxants such as benzodiazepines, methocarbamol, and cyclobenzaprine
Answer:
As more people rush into the hospital, less spave willl be available depedning on where they are placed, what happened, and what care is needed. If there was a fire, there would be alot of people with burns or smoke inhalation causing the hospitals disatser response to take act differenetly instead if there was an epidemic where people are sick but not usually physically harmed.
Explanation:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
The main difference between EHR and PHR systems is that EHR systems are manged by health care providers and PHR systems are used by the patient. The terms EHR, PHR, and even electronic medical record (EHR), are frequently used interchangeably, but are actually quite different.
