Answer:
Muslim forces ultimately expelled the European Christians who invaded the eastern Mediterranean repeatedly in the 12th and 13th centuries—and thwarted their effort to regain control of sacred Holy Land sites such as Jerusalem. Still, most histories of the Crusades offer a largely one-sided view, drawn originally from European medieval chronicles, then filtered through 18th and 19th-century Western scholars.
But how did Muslims at the time view the invasions? (Not always so contentiously, it turns out.) And what did they think of the European interlopers? (One common cliché: “unwashed barbarians.”) For a nuanced view of the medieval Muslim world, HISTORY talked with two prominent scholars: Paul M. Cobb, professor of Islamic History at the University of Pennsylvania, author of Race for Paradise: An Islamic History of the Crusades, and Suleiman A. Mourad, a professor of religion at Smith College and author of The Mosaic of Islam.
Answer:
The correct answer is <u>behavioral perspective</u>.
Explanation:
The behavioral perspective explains that the behavior is influenced by the environment in which the person develops, it can be family, social, work, etc. Initially, this theoretical position was interested in observable behaviors, that is, the behaviors exhibited by people and those of those in their environment who accounted for them. Depending on the environment, man's behavior may be modified or affected according to the same and the environment to which they are exposed daily, to which they will respond in a positive or negative way seeking better performance or conversely disinterested in goals.
<span>Prejudice is an attitude or prejudgment.
Prejudice refers to preconceived notions and beliefs about individuals belonging to certain racial, gender or social groups. These beliefs about individuals are usually negative and they are not necessarily true. Examples of prejudices are: "Black men are aggressive", "Women are weak", or "Boys are better than girls at mathematics".</span>
Regarding the suitability or not of bipartisanship in democracy, there are conflicting opinions. There are those who think that it is positive because it helps the political and general stability of a nation, while others believe that it supposes an unhealthy diminution of opinions represented in the agencies of power, and that there is no real opposition that fosters corruption.
In general, the bipartisanship leaves aside the opinions of people who do not identify with any of the parties. therefore their opinions, are not represented.
A treaty is a formally concluded & ratified agreement between countries. an exective agreement is an international agreement made by the executive branch o the us gov without ratification by the senate. executive agreements are made for routine administrative matters where a treaty isnt necessary
