Answer:
Even though this question is missing the options, after analyzing the revision we can safely say it was made for <u>conciseness</u>.
Explanation:
Conciseness can be simply defined as saying a lot in just a few words. Notice how the original paragraph is much longer than the revised one. The writer gave much more information than what was truly necessary. Details such as "and that new procedures need to be initiated" and "who was sympathetic" are superfluous. The first one adds nothing of value. If the procedures are inadequate, it is quite obvious that new ones need to be initiated. Readers could infer that. The second one is permeated with subjectivity, not only making the paragraph longer, but also stating an opinion that in uncalled for in this context. By eliminating the extra words, the writer made the paragraph concise, using fewer words to express the necessary.
what did who imply? and what are you talking about?
<span>"A man, young lady! Lady, such a manAs all the world. Why, he’s a man of wax."The nurse believes Paris to be a fine, young man; with a body so perfect he looks like a statue carved from wax. "Nay, he’s a flower. In faith, a very flower."</span>
Mr. Ellingford (my boss) gave me the keys to the supply room to get a roll of paper towels.
Do you have separated answers?
In the choices above, the correct answer that corresponds to the statement is letter A, there is one right source for a certain information. It is because in doing a research, there is always a source in order for your information to be true or for it to have a support. Researches are in need to bear in mind that there are always a source for each information.
