a noun
jack and milly came to tea
jack is he,milly she and little susie? well that's me
<h2>♨ANSWER♥</h2>
Cell phones have changed everyone’s lives since the 1980’s. Some of the cell phones we have today have internet so we can use them both, for work and for play. This is more than half of the time we spend. Cell phones change lives in a bad way because we become attached to them. They affect grammar and listening.
The apple company has come out with so many new apple products. That include about five different iphones. So many teens have the iphones now that everyone has been getting them. Having the iphone also helps kids to fit in. Even kids under thirteen have cell phones and text with them 24/7.
In some public schools kids use them during class and don’t even get in trouble. Even some teachers in public schools text during class or talk on the phone. So even adults are obsessed with their phones. If schools don’t take phones before school starts, then kids are going to think they can use their phones whenever they want. Teenagers are probably way more obsessed with their cell phones than adults though.
Cell phones also help us in a good way though. We are more connected with people than people back in the days were. If we want to talk to somebody we can just call them. When we’re out and we need to call our parents we can call them without having to use a friend’s phone and embarrassing yourself. Plus if we want to go somewhere we can call or text for a ride so we can also connect for travel easier too.
Cell phones are both good and bad for everyone. If we use them all day, everyday then thats a bad thing. If we use them for work or connection thats a good thing. We can use cell phones for many reasons. Cell phones can change everyone’s lives.
<u>☆</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>hope this helps</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>☆</u>
_♡_<em>mashi</em>_♡_
It can be inferred that the disagreement in the excerpt most likely represents "different ways of responding to life’s hardships" (Option D).
<h3>
What is an inference?</h3>
Having examined rationally, the facts of a text or a story, the conclusion i s drawn afterward is what could be referred to as an inference.
Thus it is right to state that the inference from the excerpt most likely represents "different ways of responding to life’s hardships"
Learn more about inferences at;
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
Jem had to go back for his pants because the lie Dill told to Atticus didn't involve his pants being destroyed, only lost. He said he had lost them in "strip poker." Jem couldn't argue with that lie and come up with a better one where the pants were actually destroyed or else he would risk exposing the lie, so he had to go along with it.
If he hadn't come up with the pants relatively soon, Atticus would have punished him for losing them permanently, a punishment Jem seemed eager to avoid when he said he had not been "whipped" for a long time and he didn't want it to happen again. He clearly has a healthy respect for Atticus and is also afraid of the whip, as he should be. Atticus would have either punished him for losing the pants (something it would cost money to replace) or have punished him for lying, had he found out how the pants were really lost.
So, Jem really had no choice but to go back for his pants, as scary as that prospect was.
Explanation:
