Answer:
These philosophers attempted to expand the conceptions of religion, attaching aspects of reason and critical thinking. These points were the fundamental basis of the Baroque, once this period was extremely religious, but also a moment in history when science and the thought was in development, a heritage from the Renaissance. Descartes, Spinoza and Leibinz are traditionally considered as Rationalists philosophers. Each one of them believed that our knowledge born with us (Innatism).
Explanation:
As a conception of philosophical knowledge, the Rationalism began to take shape during the Renaissance, but its early origins can go back to Greek philosophy, with Platonic idealist theses and the conception of the principle of causality. For the rationalists, all the ideas we have originate from pure rationality, which also imposes an innate conception, that is, that the ideas have innate origins in the human being, being born with us in our intellect and being used and discovered by the people who they make better use of reason.
Rumored by contemporaries that he had made a pact with the devil for his musical abilities, Paganini refused to publish his own work, which he alone would perform.
Answer:
The Greeks joined clinical and clinical life structures hypothesis from the Egyptians, which, in this sense, assumed a vital part in preparing for the improvement of the anatomical sciences (Loukas et al., 2011; Standring, 2006). Galen (129–199 AD) and Aristotle are typically viewed as the dads of life structures (Russel, 1916; Singer, 2005; Leroi, 2014). However, Galen's human life systems were frequently off-base, since he never dismembered people, in any event not to the public information. The way of life of human analyzation grew essentially in the Christian West, rather than the Greco‐Roman culture of the dead body, in which the human body was viewed as debased (Park, 2006). Indeed, Galen based his depictions of human life structures on analyzations of creatures, for example, sheep, bulls, pigs, canines, bears, and especially the "Barbary gorilla," an Old World monkey (Macaca Sylvanus) that has a minimal tail and subsequently cursorily appears to be a primate in this regard (Singer, 2005, 2016; Cole, 1975). Since the life systems of this monkey are altogether different from that of people, especially concerning delicate tissues, for example, muscles (Diogo and Wood, 2012), verifiable blunders had large amounts of Galen's depictions of human life structures. For example, he didn't depict the two most curious muscles of the human forelimb, the flexor pollicis longus, and extensor pollicis brevis, as unmistakable muscles (more models given in Supporting Information Table 1). Also, aside from such exact depictions of macaques that are mistaken for people, he incorrectly portrayed highlights that are comparative in people and macaques, adding to additional blunders about human life structures. For instance, he didn't perceive the extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus as discrete muscles (Supporting Information Table 1).
Explanation:
Brainliest :)
