It was Maj. General John Bankhead Magruder, a Confederate soldier who has helped retake (from the Confederation's point of view) Galveston during the civil war.
Answer:
This is an opinion!
Explanation:
Okay, so we all know the Articals of Confederation were too weak and it made the government crumble. Shay's Rebellion is what proved this. So it's obvious the government needs to change, but should you keep the Articals?? That is your opinion.
If completely scrap:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not the best work. We can't fund the army, states are going against each other, and the people are all rather poor. There is no way we can fix this without starting over! There is no way we can stand by this without our government crumbling. We all worked so hard to have life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but we can only have that if our government is stronger."
If just revise:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not our best work, but we can't just scrap it completely! We only need to edit it. It has it's pros, like declaring war! We can't have too strong of a government, or else all we fought for would be for nothing! The Articals were thoughtfully written out, and just scrapping it would be a complete waste."
Either one is fine, you can use whichever! Try rewriting it in your own words, and be creative. Hope this helps! :))
That would be the social structuralism perspectives. The social structuralism is a complex perspective in which it approach society as a whole on a Macro Level . This perspective look at all of social functions and social structure, which include both social conservatives and socialists' views.
its strengthens the behavior
The answer is going to be Propaganda :DD
