Answer:A.They can harm consumers by fixing prices.
Yes I would sacrifice potentially winning the state title. Using performance enhancing drugs is both morally wrong, and illegal. If my team was to win states I would want it to be because we deserved it, not because players were taking drugs. Not only that, but the players who took the drugs could be causing a lot of harm to their bodies, something that isn't worth a title.
Answer:
Owner's equity at year end would be $61,100
Explanation:
$58,900(Beginning equity) + $8,200 (Net income increases owner's equity) - $2,500 (This is paid out of retained earnings/owner's equity) - $3,500 ( A repurchase of stocks reduced owner's equity as cash would have been given to the shareholder for their equity) = $61,100
Answer: No, it is not a violation of RESPA
Explanation:
No, the scenario in this question is not a violation of the RESPA conduct because there is no penalization if an organization pays an individual for the services performed. The RESPA violations of bribery, referrals, and the fee splitting proscription are therefore subject to the severe penalties which further includes fines and imprisonment.
You should sturter allot or say the same word over again